The logical problem of evil the evidential problem of evil skeptical theism as a response can theists accept the factual premise designed the free will defense . The problem of evil is usually seen as the problem of how the existence of god can be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world the problem simply stems from basic beliefs or assumptions pertaining to the attributes of god: god is perfectly good, omniscient, and omnipotent from this, such a god should want to prevent evil, yet much evil exists there have been many proposed solutions to problem of evil, one being the free will defense/argument. The logical problem of evil if god has made men such that in their free choices they sometimes “the heart of the free will defense is the claim that it is .
Editor's note: there has been rising interest in the problem of evil in our comment boxes, and many atheist commenters requested a stronger engagement with the so-called evidential version of that argument so on wednesday we featured a defense of the evidential version from atheist brian . How can a good god allow evil to flourish this animation looks at this puzzling question  the free will defence: a good god vs the problem of evil - openlearn - open university. Besides moral evil, for the free will defense to be useful to theists in answering the logical problem of evil it must also be able applicable to natural evils since natural evils can’t be attributed to the free acts of man, plantinga needs a different approach to explain the presence of such evil with the existence of a loving god. The greater good defense is more often argued in religious studies in response to the evidential version of the problem of evil, while the free will defense is usually discussed in the context of the logical version.
In another article, the problem of evil, by pj mchugh (2006), the same argument was put forward about the problem of evil as stated by mchugh (2006), the common ground of all who believe why god allows evil to prosper in this world is the free-will defence. But creatures who are free to love god must also be free to hate or ignore him creatures who are free to follow his will must also be free to reject it and when people act in ways outside the will of god, great evil and suffering is the ultimate result this line of thinking is known as the “free will defense” concerning the problem of evil. Pope francis on his trip to the philippines had a hard time answering a question about why children suffer, but he implied an answer--what philosophers of religion call the free will defense. A critique of the free will defense, a comprehensive look at alvin plantinga’s solution to the problem of evil keywords cola, philosophy subject categories. The argument from evil is an inference that a 3- omni god cannot exist, because this is inconsistent with the presence of so much evil in the world theists reject this with the free-will defense, which suggests that god had to allow evil because it is a necessary consequence of free will my.
The logical problem of evil makes a claim based on logic the free will defense shows that it fails, based on logic a person is not obligated to accept any of plantinga’s views in order to recognize that—logically—his defense succeeds in defeating that particular version of the problem of evil. We live in a world festering with evil how could a good god allow this problem of evil narrated by harry shearer scripted by nigel warburton from the bbc. The problem of evil, then, must be recast as the problem of unjustified evil it is clear, for the reasons described above, that not all evil is unjustified some evil is brought into the world not by god but by man, and it is better that free agents and some evil exist than that no free agents and no evil exist. But the might here does not indicate mere logical possibility, as it does in plantinga's free will defense against the logical problem of evil rather the might represents epistemic possibility: a defense is a story that may be true for all anyone knows. Can the free will defense solve the problem of evil(i) state and explain the atheist's argument from evil for the nonexistence of god(ii) define and exp.
The free will defense can be viewed as an attempt to show that there some kinds of good that even an all-good, all-powerful, all-knowing god can't bring about without permitting evil. Many questions regarding evil and god comprise this issue, but all are known under the guise of 'the problem of evil the answers to the problem of evil are known as 'theodicy', which literally means god justified, (meaning god is justified despite the existence of evil). The problem of evil disproved by the free will defense - the problem of evil disproved by the free will defense the problem of evil states that because evil exists the existence of a tri-omni being, which we typically refer to as god, is impossible. In his book on god, freedom, and evil, alvin plantinga explores the problem of evil through a series of sub-topics: the omnipotence of god, the possibility of our world being the best of all possible worlds, and the question of free will plantinga begins by establishing god as an omnipotent being with no nonlogical limits to his power. Attack based on the persistence of evil if god is all good, he would destroy evil if god is all-powerful, he could destroy evil but evil is not destroyed hence, there is no such god 2 christian responses christians should learn to state the free-will defense against the problem of evil quickly and clearly.
Free essay: the problem of evil disproved by the free will defense the problem of evil states that because evil exists the existence of a tri-omni being . In examining the problem of evil, alvin plantinga holds that the free will defense is an acceptable method for overcoming the claim that the problem of evil negates the existence of god plantinga outlines the free will defense as stating, “a world containing creatures who are significantly free (and freely perform more good than evil actions . Stated in its most powerful way, the logical problem of evil is this: a god that would create a world that would contain evil cannot be the omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god of the bible but the god (if any) that created this world is a god that created a world that contains evil therefore the god that created this world cannot be the omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent god of the bible.
Alvin plantinga's free will defense is a logical argument developed by american analytic philosopher alvin plantinga, the john a o'brien professor of philosophy emeritus at the university of notre dame, and published in its final version in his 1977 book god, freedom, and evil. The problem of evil can sometimes seem to be a special case of a more general problem, the seeming absence of god fromthe world, the convictionthat some people sometimes feel that, if there is a god at all,. The basic idea of the free process defense to the problem of evil says the natural world is a dynamic place made up of interacting systems these interacting systems depend upon one another and mutually influence one another.
Free essays & term papers - the free will defense and the problem of evil, philosophy. Plantinga's free will defense has been the most famous theistic response to the logical problem of evil because he did more to clarify the issues surrounding the logical problem than anyone else it has not, however, been the only such response.